Showing posts with label National Gallery of Victoria. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Gallery of Victoria. Show all posts

Tuesday, 18 December 2007

The Besties - bits'n'pieces edition


Best collection of images I saw online this year: The NSW Police Department mug shots on Picture Australia.



Best art work I saw in real life this year: Maurizio Cattelan's We are the revolution in the Guggenheim show at the NGV.

Best news item about pre-pubescent art collectors: from the Wall Street Journal

Best reason not to let your curator blog

Images, from top:

Mug shot of Hazel McGuinness, Central Police Station, Sydney, 26 July 1929. From the Picture Australia website.


Tuesday, 14 August 2007

Guggenheim @ NGV: highs, lows, and distressed attendants

Last week in Melbourne I went to see the Guggenheim exhibition at the National Gallery of Victoria. Created just for the NGV, the show had all the hallmarks of a blockbuster: extensive (somewhat baffling) advertising campaign, sizeable ($20) entry charge, bags of merchandise and a mixed selection of works.

My best moment in the show was seeing Maurizio Cattelan's We are the Revolution. Placed at the end of a narrow corridor which was blocked off from the rest of the final gallery, I laughed out loud when I rounded the corner and saw it (no on else did though, so maybe I'm the weirdo). It's fantastic - the slump of the shoulders, the quirk of the eyebrows, the nap of the suit.



There were some other things that were fantastic to see in all their painterly fleshiness: like Lucio Fontana's exquisite Concetto spaziale, Attese (the NGV also had a beautiful Fontana on display in their contemporary international collection gallery)



and Ellsworth Kelly's Dark Blue Curve.



Both of these are the kind of painting that do nothing in reproduction, and everything when you get to stand in front of them. And standing in front of works was quite easy - although there were crowds of people, a preponderance of audio guides meant viewers tended to stand well back from the work they were listening too, and the guards were being fairly relaxed (although more on that shortly).

Part of the reason that the guards were being laid back was that the majority of the paintings in the first room of the show - the Pollock, the Frankenthaler et al - were inside glazed frames. This was okay for the mini Pollock, but the bigger paintings were just ruined. Motherwell's Elegy to the Spanish Republic No. 110 was almost impossible to view unless you were nose-to-frame with it: standing back to try to take in the whole work equated to watching 20-odd people reflected against a cream and black background.




And the two glazed Agnes Martin paintings just died on the walls, which was such a shame.



Apart from the Cattelan, my most enjoyable time in the show was spent watching the antics of the poor attendant patrolling the thin white line that surrounded Ann Hamilton's between taxonomy and communion, a long table covered with iron oxide powder and approximately 14,000 human and animal teeth.


The people actually looking at the table were very careful. The barrier line was barely noticeable, however, meaning that people passing the work to get to other parts of the exhibition tended to step over it. At which time, the attendant would streak after them and reprimand them. When she wasn't running after accidental interlopers, she was hovering anxiously and craning her neck around to spot infringements, like a chicken on speed.

Although it had some definite highpoints, the Guggenheim show was overall a disappointment - somewhat incoherent and inelegantly displayed, especially when compared to the smaller, well-chosen and beautifully hung works in the permanent collection.

Images:

Maurizio Cattelan,
We are the Revolution (La Rivoluzione siamo noi) 2000. Polyester resin figure, felt suit, and metal coat rack, ed. 3/3. Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York.

Lucio Fontana,
Concetto spaziale, Attese 1965. Water-based paint on canvas. 130 x 97 cm.
Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation.

Ellsworth Kelly,
Dark Blue Curve, 1995. Oil on canvas. 46 x 190 inches. Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum.

Robert Motherwell,
Elegy to the Spanish Republic No. 110, Easter Day, 1971. Acrylic with pencil and charcoal on canvas, 82 x 114 inches. Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, Gift, Agnes Gund, 1984.

Agnes Martin, White Flower, 1960. Oil on canvas, 71 7/8 x 72 inches. Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, Anonymous gift, 1963.

Ann Hamilton, between taxonomy and communion 1990. Steel table, iron oxide powder, and approximately 14,000 human and animal teeth. 78.7 x 487.7 x 137.2 cm (table). Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York. Gift, Ginny Williams in honor of the artist, 2004.

Friday, 23 February 2007

Putting your coverage where the money went

There's a small article tucked away on page B8 of today's Dom Post, announcing that Fairfax Media has "won newspaper sponsorship of one of the most significant exhibitions to be staged in the southern hemisphere."

Hooray, I hear you say. The Dom is going to sponsor some fantastic art event in Wellington.

Well, no. The Dom (as a Fairfax-owned paper) is now technically a sponsor of the National Gallery of Victoria's exhibition Guggenheim Collection: 1940s to Now - New York-Venice-Bilbao-Berlin (30 June - 7 October).

Here's a link to more about the show on the NGV site; the site keeps crashing on me, but better luck to you.

The Fairfax story doesn't appear to be online anywhere (and yes, I did look properly), but to transcribe:

"The Dominion Post editor Tim Pankhurst said that sponsoring the exhibition was a coup for the newspaper and Fairfax Media, as many New Zealanders would visit Melbourne to view the masterpieces and want to read more about the artists and their works.

'The National Gallery of Victoria and The Dominion Post are a perfect fit and we look forward to bringing our readers comprehensive, quality coverage.'"
Let's go over that, slowly.

"many New Zealanders would visit Melbourne to view the masterpieces and want to read more about the artists and their works" ... in the Dom? Which is suddenly big in Melbourne? Or, instead of reading about the show in some run-of-the-mill local rag like, say, The Age, New Zealanders will wait until they're back on this side of the ditch before reading anything more about the exhibition?

"The National Gallery of Victoria and The Dominion Post are a perfect fit". Distance makes the heart grow fonder, I guess, but mightn't the Dom be a perfect fit with someone, I dunno, a bit closer to where they're published?

"comprehensive, quality coverage." Tim - have you read the Arts section lately?

For more (and I'll admit it, much better) commentary on the vagaries of corporate sponsorship, see this recent post by Edward Winkleman.